Code
library(tidyverse)
library(ggplot2)
library(dplyr)
library(readxl)
::opts_chunk$set(echo = TRUE, warning=FALSE, message=FALSE) knitr
Meredith Rolfe
August 17, 2022
Today’s challenge is to:
pivot_longer
Read in one (or more) of the following datasets, using the correct R package and command.
rawData <- read_excel("_data/USA Households by Total Money Income, Race, and Hispanic Origin of Householder 1967 to 2019.xlsx",
skip = 2)
View(rawData)
#Trimming top and bottom
trimmedData <- rawData %>%
slice(3:354)
#renaming cols
columnNames <- c('Year', 'Count','totDistSum','Percentdist_under15','Percentdist15_25','Percentdist25_35','Percentdist35_50','Percentdist50_75','Percentdist75_100','Percentdist100_150','Percentdist150_200', 'Percentdist200andover','MedianIncome_est', 'MedianIncome_MOE', 'MeanIncome_est', 'MeanIncome_MOE')
colnames(trimmedData)<- columnNames
mutatedData <- trimmedData %>%
mutate(Race =NA, .before =1 )
# hate that i am doing this...
mutatedData$Race[1+1] <- "ALL RACES"
mutatedData$Race[57+1] <- "WHITE ALONE"
mutatedData$Race[78+1] <- "WHITE"
mutatedData$Race[114+1] <- "WHITE ALONE, NOT HISPANIC"
mutatedData$Race[135+1] <- "WHITE, NOT HISPANIC"
mutatedData$Race[166+1] <- "BLACK ALONE OR IN COMBINATION"
mutatedData$Race[187+1] <- "BLACK ALONE"
mutatedData$Race[208+1] <- "BLACK"
mutatedData$Race[244+1] <- "ASIAN ALONE OR IN COMBINATION"
mutatedData$Race[265+1] <- "ASIAN ALONE"
mutatedData$Race[286+1] <- "ASIAN AND PACIFIC ISLANDER"
mutatedData$Race[302+1] <- "HISPANIC (ANY RACE)"
mutatedData$Race[265+1] <- "HISPANIC (ANY RACE)"
mutatedData <- mutatedData %>%
filter(!is.na(Count)) %>%
fill(Race)
# now cleaning values
mutatedData[mutatedData == 'N']<- NA
mutatedData <- mutatedData %>%
mutate(across(Count:MeanIncome_MOE, as.double))
mutatedData <- mutatedData %>%
mutate(Year =substr(Year,1,4))
round(mutatedData$Percentdist15_25 ,2)
[1] 8.0 8.8 9.1 9.1 9.0 10.0 10.5 10.3 10.4 10.6 10.2 10.7 10.0 10.0 10.0
[16] 9.5 9.8 9.7 9.7 9.8 9.6 9.3 9.7 9.8 10.3 10.5 10.4 10.8 10.6 10.6
[31] 10.3 10.1 10.0 9.7 10.0 10.0 10.6 10.8 10.9 10.8 10.9 10.7 10.2 10.5 11.2
[46] 11.3 11.4 10.7 10.8 10.3 10.2 10.1 9.9 10.1 10.2 7.5 8.3 8.6 8.7 8.6
[61] 9.5 10.1 10.0 9.9 10.2 9.6 10.4 9.6 9.7 9.6 9.1 9.3 9.4 9.3 9.4
[76] 9.4 9.0 9.3 9.3 9.8 10.1 10.0 10.3 10.1 10.1 9.9 9.7 9.6 9.0 9.5
[91] 9.5 10.0 10.2 10.3 10.2 10.2 10.1 9.5 9.9 10.5 10.5 10.8 10.0 10.0 9.6
[106] 9.5 9.4 9.3 9.3 9.4 7.3 7.8 8.3 8.5 8.2 9.1 9.5 9.4 9.5 9.8
[121] 9.3 10.0 9.0 9.2 9.2 8.8 9.0 9.1 9.0 9.1 9.0 8.7 8.9 8.8 9.4
[136] 9.6 9.5 10.0 9.7 9.8 9.6 9.2 9.4 8.7 9.1 9.2 9.6 9.9 10.0 9.9
[151] 10.0 9.9 9.4 9.8 10.3 10.3 10.6 9.8 9.9 9.3 11.5 12.6 12.5 12.1 12.3
[166] 13.5 13.9 13.3 14.4 14.2 14.0 13.6 13.5 12.9 13.1 12.9 13.7 12.1 12.8 13.0
[181] 11.5 12.6 12.6 12.2 12.4 13.6 14.0 13.5 14.5 14.3 14.0 13.5 13.6 13.0 13.1
[196] 12.9 13.7 12.1 12.8 13.0 12.3 11.9 12.8 13.5 13.6 14.3 14.0 14.0 14.4 14.1
[211] 13.3 13.9 13.4 14.2 14.2 14.2 15.2 16.1 15.9 15.6 16.0 16.3 15.8 15.4 17.5
[226] 17.6 16.9 16.4 16.9 16.5 16.2 15.8 16.1 17.0 17.7 5.1 6.3 6.4 6.3 6.1
[241] 6.5 6.5 7.2 6.2 6.3 8.1 7.7 6.4 6.9 6.6 6.0 6.6 6.6 7.4 6.6
[256] 5.0 6.2 6.4 6.4 6.0 6.4 6.5 7.3 6.4 6.4 8.0 7.6 6.4 6.9 6.7
[271] 6.1 6.9 6.6 7.4 6.6 6.5 6.0 7.0 7.5 7.9 7.4 8.5 8.9 8.6 8.1
[286] 7.4 7.5 7.9 8.7 9.0 8.8 10.9 10.4 10.3 10.8 11.9 13.2 13.4 12.7 13.0
[301] 12.1 12.8 12.9 13.0 12.3 11.5 12.0 12.0 12.0 11.8 12.6 11.9 13.4 13.7 13.9
[316] 15.1 14.6 14.4 14.8 14.0 13.8 15.0 12.4 12.4 14.0 14.3 15.7 14.3 14.8 15.2
[331] 13.8 14.0 12.9 13.3 14.8 15.3 14.7 15.4 14.2 16.0
# A tibble: 340 × 17
Race Year Count totDi…¹ Perce…² Perce…³ Perce…⁴ Perce…⁵ Perce…⁶ Perce…⁷
<chr> <chr> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl>
1 ALL RAC… 2019 128451 100 9.1 8 8.3 11.7 16.5 12.3
2 ALL RAC… 2018 128579 100 10.1 8.8 8.7 12 17 12.5
3 ALL RAC… 2017 127669 100 10 9.1 9.2 12 16.4 12.4
4 ALL RAC… 2017 127586 100 10.1 9.1 9.2 11.9 16.3 12.6
5 ALL RAC… 2016 126224 100 10.4 9 9.2 12.3 16.7 12.2
6 ALL RAC… 2015 125819 100 10.6 10 9.6 12.1 16.1 12.4
7 ALL RAC… 2014 124587 100 11.4 10.5 9.6 12.6 16.4 12.1
8 ALL RAC… 2013 123931 100 11.4 10.3 9.5 12.5 16.8 12
9 ALL RAC… 2013 122952 100 11.3 10.4 9.7 13.1 17 12.5
10 ALL RAC… 2012 122459 100 11.4 10.6 10.1 12.5 17.4 12
# … with 330 more rows, 7 more variables: Percentdist100_150 <dbl>,
# Percentdist150_200 <dbl>, Percentdist200andover <dbl>,
# MedianIncome_est <dbl>, MedianIncome_MOE <dbl>, MeanIncome_est <dbl>,
# MeanIncome_MOE <dbl>, and abbreviated variable names ¹totDistSum,
# ²Percentdist_under15, ³Percentdist15_25, ⁴Percentdist25_35,
# ⁵Percentdist35_50, ⁶Percentdist50_75, ⁷Percentdist75_100
# trying to copy over year column to a new column 'Race" conditionally based on the Count column
# I then planned to fill the race column NAs with previous values
# trimmedData %>%
# filter(is.na(Count))
#
#
#
# mutatedData <- trimmedData%>%
# mutate(Race =
# case_when(Count == NA ~ trimmedData$Year[1]), .before =1)
#
# mutatedData <- trimmedData%>%
# mutate(Race =
# case_when(Count == NA ~ 1), .before =1)
#
# mutatedData
Describe the data, and be sure to comment on why you are planning to pivot it to make it “tidy”
The data contains information on income, grouped by race for American households from as early as 1967 to 2019.
My plan to make this data “tidy” is to rename all the columns so that they can be represented in one header. I will then add a race column which will contain the race for that particular observation. Year will also have its own column.
# i dont include the percent distribution column
race <- c("value1","value2","value3")
year <- c("value1","value2","value3")
Count <- c("value1","value2","value3")
Percentdist_under15 <- c("value1","value2","value3")
Percentdist15_25 <- c("value1","value2","value3")
Percentdist25_35 <- c("value1","value2","value3")
Percentdist35_50 <- c("value1","value2","value3")
Percentdist50_75 <- c("value1","value2","value3")
Percentdist75_100 <- c("value1","value2","value3")
Percentdist100_150 <- c("value1","value2","value3")
Percentdist150_200 <- c("value1","value2","value3")
Percentdist200andover <- c("value1","value2","value3")
MedianIncome_est <- c("value1","value2","value3")
MedianIncome_MOE <- c("value1","value2","value3")
MeanIncome_est <- c("value1","value2","value3")
MeanIncome_MOE <- c("value1","value2","value3")
sampleDF <- data.frame(race,year,Count,Percentdist_under15,Percentdist15_25,Percentdist25_35,Percentdist35_50,Percentdist50_75,Percentdist75_100,Percentdist100_150,Percentdist150_200,
Percentdist200andover,MedianIncome_est,MedianIncome_MOE,MeanIncome_est,MeanIncome_MOE)
sampleDF
race year Count Percentdist_under15 Percentdist15_25 Percentdist25_35
1 value1 value1 value1 value1 value1 value1
2 value2 value2 value2 value2 value2 value2
3 value3 value3 value3 value3 value3 value3
Percentdist35_50 Percentdist50_75 Percentdist75_100 Percentdist100_150
1 value1 value1 value1 value1
2 value2 value2 value2 value2
3 value3 value3 value3 value3
Percentdist150_200 Percentdist200andover MedianIncome_est MedianIncome_MOE
1 value1 value1 value1 value1
2 value2 value2 value2 value2
3 value3 value3 value3 value3
MeanIncome_est MeanIncome_MOE
1 value1 value1
2 value2 value2
3 value3 value3
The first step in pivoting the data is to try to come up with a concrete vision of what the end product should look like - that way you will know whether or not your pivoting was successful.
One easy way to do this is to think about the dimensions of your current data (tibble, dataframe, or matrix), and then calculate what the dimensions of the pivoted data should be.
Suppose you have a dataset with \(n\) rows and \(k\) variables. In our example, 3 of the variables are used to identify a case, so you will be pivoting \(k-3\) variables into a longer format where the \(k-3\) variable names will move into the names_to
variable and the current values in each of those columns will move into the values_to
variable. Therefore, we would expect \(n * (k-3)\) rows in the pivoted dataframe!
Lets see if this works with a simple example.
# A tibble: 6 × 5
country year trade outgoing incoming
<chr> <dbl> <chr> <dbl> <dbl>
1 Mexico 1980 NAFTA 1091. 845.
2 USA 1990 NAFTA 1446. 1164.
3 France 1980 EU 377. 841.
4 Mexico 1990 NAFTA 1466. 699.
5 USA 1980 NAFTA 530. 644.
6 France 1990 EU 1152. 714.
[1] 385
[1] 16
[1] 210
[1] 17
Document your work here.
race year Count Percentdist_under15 Percentdist15_25 Percentdist25_35
1 value1 value1 value1 value1 value1 value1
2 value2 value2 value2 value2 value2 value2
3 value3 value3 value3 value3 value3 value3
Percentdist35_50 Percentdist50_75 Percentdist75_100 Percentdist100_150
1 value1 value1 value1 value1
2 value2 value2 value2 value2
3 value3 value3 value3 value3
Percentdist150_200 Percentdist200andover MedianIncome_est MedianIncome_MOE
1 value1 value1 value1 value1
2 value2 value2 value2 value2
3 value3 value3 value3 value3
MeanIncome_est MeanIncome_MOE
1 value1 value1
2 value2 value2
3 value3 value3
Any additional comments?
Document your work here. What will a new “case” be once you have pivoted the data? How does it meet requirements for tidy data?
If you wanted to see a side by side of the mean and median income estimates and MOE you could pivot your data as follows.
# A tibble: 1,360 × 17
Race Year Count totDi…¹ Perce…² Perce…³ Perce…⁴ Perce…⁵ Perce…⁶ Perce…⁷
<chr> <chr> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl>
1 ALL RAC… 2019 128451 100 9.1 8 8.3 11.7 16.5 12.3
2 ALL RAC… 2019 128451 100 9.1 8 8.3 11.7 16.5 12.3
3 ALL RAC… 2019 128451 100 9.1 8 8.3 11.7 16.5 12.3
4 ALL RAC… 2019 128451 100 9.1 8 8.3 11.7 16.5 12.3
5 ALL RAC… 2018 128579 100 10.1 8.8 8.7 12 17 12.5
6 ALL RAC… 2018 128579 100 10.1 8.8 8.7 12 17 12.5
7 ALL RAC… 2018 128579 100 10.1 8.8 8.7 12 17 12.5
8 ALL RAC… 2018 128579 100 10.1 8.8 8.7 12 17 12.5
9 ALL RAC… 2017 127669 100 10 9.1 9.2 12 16.4 12.4
10 ALL RAC… 2017 127669 100 10 9.1 9.2 12 16.4 12.4
# … with 1,350 more rows, 7 more variables: Percentdist100_150 <dbl>,
# Percentdist150_200 <dbl>, Percentdist200andover <dbl>, Median <chr>,
# Values_med <dbl>, Mean <chr>, Values_mean <dbl>, and abbreviated variable
# names ¹totDistSum, ²Percentdist_under15, ³Percentdist15_25,
# ⁴Percentdist25_35, ⁵Percentdist35_50, ⁶Percentdist50_75, ⁷Percentdist75_100
---
title: "Challenge 3 Instructions"
author: "Meredith Rolfe"
desription: "Tidy Data: Pivoting"
date: "08/17/2022"
format:
html:
toc: true
code-fold: true
code-copy: true
code-tools: true
categories:
- challenge_3
- animal_weights
- eggs
- australian_marriage
- usa_households
- sce_labor
---
```{r}
#| label: setup
#| warning: false
#| message: false
library(tidyverse)
library(ggplot2)
library(dplyr)
library(readxl)
knitr::opts_chunk$set(echo = TRUE, warning=FALSE, message=FALSE)
```
## Challenge Overview
Today's challenge is to:
1. read in a data set, and describe the data set using both words and any supporting information (e.g., tables, etc)
2. identify what needs to be done to tidy the current data
3. anticipate the shape of pivoted data
4. pivot the data into tidy format using `pivot_longer`
## Read in data
Read in one (or more) of the following datasets, using the correct R package and command.
- animal_weights.csv ⭐
- eggs_tidy.csv ⭐⭐ or organiceggpoultry.xls ⭐⭐⭐
- australian_marriage\*.xls ⭐⭐⭐
- USA Households\*.xlsx ⭐⭐⭐⭐
- sce_labor_chart_data_public.xlsx 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟
```{r}
rawData <- read_excel("_data/USA Households by Total Money Income, Race, and Hispanic Origin of Householder 1967 to 2019.xlsx",
skip = 2)
View(rawData)
#Trimming top and bottom
trimmedData <- rawData %>%
slice(3:354)
#renaming cols
columnNames <- c('Year', 'Count','totDistSum','Percentdist_under15','Percentdist15_25','Percentdist25_35','Percentdist35_50','Percentdist50_75','Percentdist75_100','Percentdist100_150','Percentdist150_200', 'Percentdist200andover','MedianIncome_est', 'MedianIncome_MOE', 'MeanIncome_est', 'MeanIncome_MOE')
colnames(trimmedData)<- columnNames
mutatedData <- trimmedData %>%
mutate(Race =NA, .before =1 )
# hate that i am doing this...
mutatedData$Race[1+1] <- "ALL RACES"
mutatedData$Race[57+1] <- "WHITE ALONE"
mutatedData$Race[78+1] <- "WHITE"
mutatedData$Race[114+1] <- "WHITE ALONE, NOT HISPANIC"
mutatedData$Race[135+1] <- "WHITE, NOT HISPANIC"
mutatedData$Race[166+1] <- "BLACK ALONE OR IN COMBINATION"
mutatedData$Race[187+1] <- "BLACK ALONE"
mutatedData$Race[208+1] <- "BLACK"
mutatedData$Race[244+1] <- "ASIAN ALONE OR IN COMBINATION"
mutatedData$Race[265+1] <- "ASIAN ALONE"
mutatedData$Race[286+1] <- "ASIAN AND PACIFIC ISLANDER"
mutatedData$Race[302+1] <- "HISPANIC (ANY RACE)"
mutatedData$Race[265+1] <- "HISPANIC (ANY RACE)"
mutatedData <- mutatedData %>%
filter(!is.na(Count)) %>%
fill(Race)
# now cleaning values
mutatedData[mutatedData == 'N']<- NA
mutatedData <- mutatedData %>%
mutate(across(Count:MeanIncome_MOE, as.double))
mutatedData <- mutatedData %>%
mutate(Year =substr(Year,1,4))
round(mutatedData$Percentdist15_25 ,2)
#final tidy DF
mutatedData
# trying to copy over year column to a new column 'Race" conditionally based on the Count column
# I then planned to fill the race column NAs with previous values
# trimmedData %>%
# filter(is.na(Count))
#
#
#
# mutatedData <- trimmedData%>%
# mutate(Race =
# case_when(Count == NA ~ trimmedData$Year[1]), .before =1)
#
# mutatedData <- trimmedData%>%
# mutate(Race =
# case_when(Count == NA ~ 1), .before =1)
#
# mutatedData
```
### Briefly describe the data
Describe the data, and be sure to comment on why you are planning to pivot it to make it "tidy"
The data contains information on income, grouped by race for American households from
as early as 1967 to 2019.
My plan to make this data "tidy" is to rename all the columns so that they can be
represented in one header. I will then add a race column which will contain the race for that particular observation. Year will also have its own column.
## Anticipate the End Result
```{r}
# i dont include the percent distribution column
race <- c("value1","value2","value3")
year <- c("value1","value2","value3")
Count <- c("value1","value2","value3")
Percentdist_under15 <- c("value1","value2","value3")
Percentdist15_25 <- c("value1","value2","value3")
Percentdist25_35 <- c("value1","value2","value3")
Percentdist35_50 <- c("value1","value2","value3")
Percentdist50_75 <- c("value1","value2","value3")
Percentdist75_100 <- c("value1","value2","value3")
Percentdist100_150 <- c("value1","value2","value3")
Percentdist150_200 <- c("value1","value2","value3")
Percentdist200andover <- c("value1","value2","value3")
MedianIncome_est <- c("value1","value2","value3")
MedianIncome_MOE <- c("value1","value2","value3")
MeanIncome_est <- c("value1","value2","value3")
MeanIncome_MOE <- c("value1","value2","value3")
sampleDF <- data.frame(race,year,Count,Percentdist_under15,Percentdist15_25,Percentdist25_35,Percentdist35_50,Percentdist50_75,Percentdist75_100,Percentdist100_150,Percentdist150_200,
Percentdist200andover,MedianIncome_est,MedianIncome_MOE,MeanIncome_est,MeanIncome_MOE)
sampleDF
```
The first step in pivoting the data is to try to come up with a concrete vision of what the end product *should* look like - that way you will know whether or not your pivoting was successful.
One easy way to do this is to think about the dimensions of your current data (tibble, dataframe, or matrix), and then calculate what the dimensions of the pivoted data should be.
Suppose you have a dataset with $n$ rows and $k$ variables. In our example, 3 of the variables are used to identify a case, so you will be pivoting $k-3$ variables into a longer format where the $k-3$ variable names will move into the `names_to` variable and the current values in each of those columns will move into the `values_to` variable. Therefore, we would expect $n * (k-3)$ rows in the pivoted dataframe!
### Example: find current and future data dimensions
Lets see if this works with a simple example.
```{r}
#| tbl-cap: Example
df<-tibble(country = rep(c("Mexico", "USA", "France"),2),
year = rep(c(1980,1990), 3),
trade = rep(c("NAFTA", "NAFTA", "EU"),2),
outgoing = rnorm(6, mean=1000, sd=500),
incoming = rlogis(6, location=1000,
scale = 400))
df
#updated with my expected values
#existing rows/cases
nrow(rawData)
#existing columns/cases
ncol(rawData)
#expected rows/cases
nrow(rawData)-11 * (ncol(rawData))+1
# expected columns
(ncol(rawData))+1
```
### Challenge: Describe the final dimensions
Document your work here.
```{r}
sampleDF
```
Any additional comments?
### Challenge: Pivot the Chosen Data
Document your work here. What will a new "case" be once you have pivoted the data? How does it meet requirements for tidy data?
If you wanted to see a side by side of the mean and median income estimates and MOE you could pivot your data as follows.
```{r}
mutatedData <- mutatedData %>% pivot_longer(c(MedianIncome_est,MedianIncome_MOE), names_to = "Median",values_to = "Values_med")
mutatedData <- mutatedData %>% pivot_longer(c(MeanIncome_est,MeanIncome_MOE), names_to = "Mean",values_to = "Values_mean")
mutatedData
```